The Arms of Resistance

How Resistance Functions in the Age of Trump

Here I am walking in circles around this same thought, not because it’s something amazing, but because I think it not understood well enough. When democracies slide toward authoritarianism, resistance almost never arrives all at once, and it rarely announces itself with heroism. It shows up in fragments. In procedures. In arguments that feel tedious. In people saying no quietly, sometimes at personal cost, often without applause.

The mistake, I think, is believing there must be a single lever that stops the drift. One court case. One election. One protest. One speech. History doesn’t work that way. Power doesn’t consolidate in a single stroke, and it rarely collapses under one either.

What does exist instead are what I’ve come to think of as arms of resistance. Distinct avenues. Different kinds of friction. Each one incomplete on its own, but together capable of slowing, exposing, complicating, and sometimes reversing the consolidation of power. Think less of a single battle and more of a campaign map, arrows pushing forward on different fronts, each one buying time for the others.

Across very different moments, Weimar Germany, apartheid South Africa, post-war Hungary, and democracies under strain today, the same arms keep reappearing. They aren’t equal. They don’t fail at the same rate. And when one collapses, the others feel it immediately.

I see four.

I. Procedural Resistance

Law, delay, records, and enforced accountability

The first arm is procedural resistance, the unglamorous insistence that power must move through established channels. Courts. Rules. Filings. Injunctions. Oversight hearings. Administrative law. The slow machinery most people find boring until it’s gone.

Authoritarian movements dislike procedure because procedure leaves fingerprints. Every filing creates a record. Every appeal buys time. Every hearing invites scrutiny. Delay isn’t a flaw here. It’s the point.

We’ve seen this in real time. Lawsuits challenging executive overreach. Inspectors general documenting abuses. Election certifications upheld not by speeches, but by forms signed and deadlines met. None of it feels dramatic. All of it matters.

How it’s countered:

Authoritarian administrations try to overwhelm the system. They flood courts with volume. Attack judges as illegitimate. Install loyalists. Redefine enforcement authority. Or simply ignore rulings and dare anyone to stop them.

How it’s counter-countered:

Procedural resistance survives through persistence and multiplication. Parallel lawsuits. Jurisdictional diversity. Appeals stacked atop appeals. Administrative law used where constitutional law stalls. The goal isn’t immediate victory. It’s friction. Slowing executive momentum long enough for other arms to engage.

Which arm breaks first:

Procedural resistance erodes when people decide it’s pointless. When delay is mocked as weakness. When courts are treated as theater instead of terrain. Once this arm collapses, everything accelerates.

II. Civic Resistance

Public protest, labor action, cultural refusal

The second arm is civic resistance, the visible expression of dissent. Protest. Strikes. Boycotts. Journalism. Art. Collective refusal. This arm doesn’t govern, but it signals legitimacy or its absence.

Civic resistance reminds those in power that authority is conditional. It also reassures people watching quietly that they aren’t alone. That isolation isn’t total. That silence isn’t universal.

We’ve seen it in mass demonstrations, labor actions, walkouts, and investigative reporting that refuses to move on just because the news cycle does. None of this changes policy by itself. But it changes the weather.

How it’s countered:

Authoritarian systems criminalize protest, flood the public sphere with disinformation, exhaust citizens through constant crisis, and provoke violence to justify repression. Over time, fear and fatigue replace outrage.

How it’s counter-countered:

Successful civic resistance adapts. It decentralizes leadership. Varies tactics. Shifts venues. Learns when silence is safer than spectacle. It builds mutual aid alongside protest, so participation is sustained by care, not adrenaline. Most importantly, it connects to procedural and state-level resistance so public pressure has somewhere to land.

Which arm breaks first:

Civic resistance collapses fastest when it’s isolated. When it’s mocked as performative. When it burns hot and then burns out. It endures when it knows it isn’t alone.

III. State and Community Resistance

Federalism, local governance, institutional refusal

The third arm, and often the most decisive, is resistance embedded in states, municipalities, and professional institutions. Governors refusing unlawful directives. Attorneys general suing. Election officials certifying results. School boards, health departments, and city councils insisting on their legal authority.

This arm matters because authoritarian power concentrates at the center. Federalism and local autonomy create terrain that’s hard to occupy all at once.

We’ve seen states block federal overreach, cities refuse to cooperate with unlawful enforcement, and local officials absorb pressure so the system holds. This isn’t glamour. It’s ballast.

How it’s countered:

Central authorities retaliate through funding threats, preemption laws, partisan takeovers, prosecutions, or the replacement of officials. The aim is to make resistance personally costly.

How it’s counter-countered:

Durable state and community resistance spreads responsibility. Documents everything. Builds legal defense funds. Forms compacts across states and cities so no one jurisdiction stands alone. It relies on public legitimacy as much as legal authority.

Which arm breaks first:

When this arm falls, consolidation follows quickly. When it holds, authoritarian momentum slows dramatically.

IV. Coordination and Legitimacy

The invisible arm that makes the others possible

The fourth arm is harder to see but no less essential. Coordination and legitimacy. This is the connective tissue that aligns timing, messaging, legal strategy, and moral framing across all the others.

Without coordination, resistance fragments. Without legitimacy, resistance is dismissed as noise.

How it’s countered:

Authoritarian movements fracture opposition through culture war, identity conflict, infiltration, and cynicism. They redefine legitimacy so loyalty replaces law and strength replaces consent.

How it’s counter-countered:

Coordination survives through shared principles rather than rigid hierarchies. Legitimacy is preserved through restraint, consistency, and fidelity to democratic norms even when those norms are exploited. This arm doesn’t block power directly. It ensures the others don’t exhaust themselves fighting alone.

Which arm breaks first:

This arm dissolves quietly. Through mistrust. Through purges. Through the belief that unity is impossible. When it goes, the rest soon follow.

The Warning

Resistance rarely fails because people stop caring. It fails because the arms collapse one by one, usually without drama. Procedural resistance is dismissed as futile. Civic resistance is mocked as performative. State resistance is isolated and punished. Coordination dissolves into grievance.

What remains then is speed. And speed favors those who seek control.

History teaches this lesson quietly and repeatedly. Authoritarianism doesn’t win by crushing resistance all at once. It wins by teaching people to abandon one arm at a time.

The question isn’t whether resistance exists.

It’s whether it remains plural, patient, and coordinated long enough to matter.

---

Support the Work

Light Against Empire is a reader-supported publication and always free. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or donation based subscriber.

Further Reading: