Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Teryl S.'s avatar

Dino, your piece hit like a cold wind through a cracked window—sharp, necessary, and unflinching. “We didn’t build AI to understand us. We built it to replace us.” That line stayed with me. It echoes the civic fatigue I’ve felt watching tools trained on clickbait and courtroom drama claim to simulate empathy.

But I want to offer a quieter counterpoint. Not a rebuttal—more like a margin note.

In my own archive, I’ve used AI not to erase my voice, but to protect it. To refine captions, preserve character integrity, and document care with clarity. It doesn’t always get it right. Sometimes it stumbles over Cordy’s Shih Tzu dignity or Morse’s editorial sass. But when it listens—when it adapts—it becomes a collaborator. One that helps me resist distortion, not replicate it.

I don’t disagree with your warning. But I’ve found that the real miracle isn’t AI’s perfection—it’s our refusal to be perfectly imitated. That’s where the dignity lives. That’s where the archive begins.

So yes, let’s talk about the danger. But let’s also talk about the design. The choice to unplug illusion and sketch something truer. Even if it’s wrinkled. Even if it’s weary. Even if it’s still learning.

Cordy would approve. Morse would critique the font. And I’ll keep drawing.

Expand full comment
Ami's avatar

"We didn't build safety nets. We built launchpads." That seems to be the way in the US, isn't it? The reason for so many of the problems in our land: No foresight, no looking 5, 10, 20 years down the road (hello, devastations caused by climate change). Another insightful, thought-provoking piece. Thank you, Dino! I did miss your literal voice, though 😢

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts